The figures on this page are compiled from data files generated by the Bisq software. You can verify everything yourself by running these scripts on GitHub.
Cycle Started2 Jan 2022 / Block 716827
Cycle Ended2 Feb 2022 / Block 721506
Supply Change— 47,543
Governance24 of 24 proposals accepted
| BSQ Amount | # of transactions | |
|---|---|---|
| Burn | ||
| Proof-of-burn¹ | 162,512 | 5 |
| Trading fees² | 11,700 | 4,909 |
| Compensation request fees | 38 | 19 |
| Blind vote fees | 18 | 9 |
| Reimbursement request fees | 6 | 3 |
| Proposal fees | 4 | 2 |
| Total Burn | 174,279 | 4,988 |
| Issuance | ||
| Compensation³ | 30,722 | |
| Reimbursements⁴ | 96,014 | |
| Total Issuance | 126,736 | |
| Net BSQ Supply Change⁵ | —47,543 |
¹ Proof-of-burn includes trading fees paid in BTC and disputed BTC deposits for trades that went to arbitration (see docs for more details). Funds may be accrued and burned in different cycles, so proof-of-burn figures do not map directly to activity in their cycles.
² BSQ trading fees only. BTC trading fees are included in proof-of-burn.
³ See more details on GitHub.
⁴ Over time, the net impact of reimbursement issuances on BSQ supply is close to zero, as corresponding amounts of BTC are burned through proof-of-burn (see docs for more details).
⁵ Decreases in BSQ supply are good.