Bisq DAO Cycle 22

The figures on this page are compiled from data files generated by the Bisq software. You can verify everything yourself by running these scripts on GitHub.

Cycle Started10 Feb 2021 / Block 670027

Cycle Ended15 Mar 2021 / Block 674706

Supply Change— 33,885

Governance26 of 29 proposals accepted

Network Funds Transfers

BSQ Amount # of transactions
 Proof-of-burn¹ 157,000 2
 Trading fees² 3,511 2,515
 Compensation request fees 44 22
 Blind vote fees 20 10
 Reimbursement request fees 8 4
 Proposal fees 6 3
Total Burn 160,589 2,730
 Compensation³ 90,034
 Reimbursements⁴ 36,671
Total Issuance 126,704
Net BSQ Supply Change⁵ 33,885

¹ Proof-of-burn includes trading fees paid in BTC and disputed BTC deposits for trades that went to arbitration (see docs for more details). Funds may be accrued and burned in different cycles, so proof-of-burn figures do not map directly to activity in their cycles.

² BSQ trading fees only. BTC trading fees are included in proof-of-burn.

³ See more details on GitHub.

⁴ Over time, the net impact of reimbursement issuances on BSQ supply is close to zero, as corresponding amounts of BTC are burned through proof-of-burn (see docs for more details).

⁵ Decreases in BSQ supply are good.


Parameter change proposal for BONDED_ROLE_FACTOR


This proposal sought to reduce the BONDED_ROLE_FACTOR factor to make bonding less expensive, since the BSQ price has increased quite a bit from its initial 1-USD-per-BSQ valuation.

Parameter change proposal for DEFAULT_MAKER_FEE_BSQ


Parameter change proposal for DEFAULT_TAKER_FEE_BSQ


< See more DAO data on the Dashboard