The figures on this page are compiled from data files generated by the Bisq software. You can verify everything yourself by running these scripts on GitHub.
Cycle Started10 Feb 2021 / Block 670027
Cycle Ended15 Mar 2021 / Block 674706
Supply Change— 33,885
Governance26 of 29 proposals accepted
| BSQ Amount | # of transactions | |
|---|---|---|
| Burn | ||
| Proof-of-burn¹ | 157,000 | 2 |
| Trading fees² | 3,511 | 2,515 |
| Compensation request fees | 44 | 22 |
| Blind vote fees | 20 | 10 |
| Reimbursement request fees | 8 | 4 |
| Proposal fees | 6 | 3 |
| Total Burn | 160,589 | 2,730 |
| Issuance | ||
| Compensation³ | 90,034 | |
| Reimbursements⁴ | 36,671 | |
| Total Issuance | 126,704 | |
| Net BSQ Supply Change⁵ | —33,885 |
¹ Proof-of-burn includes trading fees paid in BTC and disputed BTC deposits for trades that went to arbitration (see docs for more details). Funds may be accrued and burned in different cycles, so proof-of-burn figures do not map directly to activity in their cycles.
² BSQ trading fees only. BTC trading fees are included in proof-of-burn.
³ See more details on GitHub.
⁴ Over time, the net impact of reimbursement issuances on BSQ supply is close to zero, as corresponding amounts of BTC are burned through proof-of-burn (see docs for more details).
⁵ Decreases in BSQ supply are good.
This proposal sought to reduce the
BONDED_ROLE_FACTORfactor to make bonding less expensive, since the BSQ price has increased quite a bit from its initial 1-USD-per-BSQ valuation.