The figures on this page are compiled from data files generated by the Bisq software. You can verify everything yourself by running these scripts on GitHub.
Cycle Started8 Nov 2020 / Block 655987
Cycle Ended9 Dec 2020 / Block 660666
Supply Change+ 21,406
Governance28 of 28 proposals accepted
| BSQ Amount | # of transactions | |
|---|---|---|
| Burn | ||
| Proof-of-burn¹ | 66,000 | 1 |
| Trading fees² | 11,559 | 2,815 |
| Compensation request fees | 46 | 23 |
| Blind vote fees | 22 | 11 |
| Proposal fees | 6 | 3 |
| Reimbursement request fees | 4 | 2 |
| Total Burn | 77,637 | 3,025 |
| Issuance | ||
| Compensation³ | 77,827 | |
| Reimbursements⁴ | 21,217 | |
| Total Issuance | 99,044 | |
| Net BSQ Supply Change⁵ | +21,406 |
¹ Proof-of-burn includes trading fees paid in BTC and disputed BTC deposits for trades that went to arbitration (see docs for more details). Funds may be accrued and burned in different cycles, so proof-of-burn figures do not map directly to activity in their cycles.
² BSQ trading fees only. BTC trading fees are included in proof-of-burn.
³ See more details on GitHub.
⁴ Over time, the net impact of reimbursement issuances on BSQ supply is close to zero, as corresponding amounts of BTC are burned through proof-of-burn (see docs for more details).
⁵ Decreases in BSQ supply are good.
RECIPIENT_BTC_ADDRESSMade by user burningman3 with this issue.
Accepted
With the approval of this proposal and the release of 1.5.0, payouts from delayed payout transactions and BTC trade fees are now sent to different addresses. This improves accounting by making it much easier to distinguish between BTC fees and BTC funds from disputed trades that went to arbitration.
As of this writing, delayed payouts go to
34VLFgtFKAtwTdZ5rengTT2g2zC99sWQLCand BTC fees go to38bZBj5peYS3Husdz7AH3gEUiUbYRD951t.