Bisq DAO Cycle 19

The figures on this page are compiled from data files generated by the Bisq software. You can verify everything yourself by running these scripts on GitHub.

Cycle Started8 Nov 2020 / Block 655987

Cycle Ended9 Dec 2020 / Block 660666

Supply Change+ 21,406

Governance28 of 28 proposals accepted

Network Funds Transfers

BSQ Amount # of transactions
 Proof-of-burn¹ 66,000 1
 Trading fees² 11,559 2,815
 Compensation request fees 46 23
 Blind vote fees 22 11
 Proposal fees 6 3
 Reimbursement request fees 4 2
Total Burn 77,637 3,025
 Compensation³ 77,827
 Reimbursements⁴ 21,217
Total Issuance 99,044
Net BSQ Supply Change⁵ +21,406

¹ Proof-of-burn includes trading fees paid in BTC and disputed BTC deposits for trades that went to arbitration (see docs for more details). Funds may be accrued and burned in different cycles, so proof-of-burn figures do not map directly to activity in their cycles.

² BSQ trading fees only. BTC trading fees are included in proof-of-burn.

³ See more details on GitHub.

⁴ Over time, the net impact of reimbursement issuances on BSQ supply is close to zero, as corresponding amounts of BTC are burned through proof-of-burn (see docs for more details).

⁵ Decreases in BSQ supply are good.


Parameter change proposal for RECIPIENT_BTC_ADDRESS


With the approval of this proposal and the release of 1.5.0, payouts from delayed payout transactions and BTC trade fees are now sent to different addresses. This improves accounting by making it much easier to distinguish between BTC fees and BTC funds from disputed trades that went to arbitration.

As of this writing, delayed payouts go to 34VLFgtFKAtwTdZ5rengTT2g2zC99sWQLC and BTC fees go to 38bZBj5peYS3Husdz7AH3gEUiUbYRD951t.

Parameter change proposal for DEFAULT_MAKER_FEE_BSQ


Parameter change proposal for DEFAULT_TAKER_FEE_BSQ


< See more DAO data on the Dashboard