The figures on this page are compiled from data files generated by the Bisq software. You can verify everything yourself by running these scripts on GitHub.
Cycle Started1 Jul 2020 / Block 637267
Cycle Ended2 Aug 2020 / Block 641946
Supply Change+ 97,721
Governance30 of 33 proposals accepted
|BSQ Amount||# of transactions|
|Compensation request fees||50||25|
|Blind vote fees||34||17|
|Reimbursement request fees||8||4|
|Net BSQ Supply Change⁵||+97,721|
¹ Proof-of-burn includes trading fees paid in BTC and disputed BTC deposits for trades that went to arbitration (see docs for more details). Funds may be accrued and burned in different cycles, so proof-of-burn figures do not map directly to activity in their cycles.
² BSQ trading fees only. BTC trading fees are included in proof-of-burn.
³ See more details on GitHub.
⁴ Over time, the net impact of reimbursement issuances on BSQ supply is close to zero, as corresponding amounts of BTC are burned through proof-of-burn (see docs for more details).
⁵ Decreases in BSQ supply are good.
This proposal sought to reinstate BCH trading on Bisq.
The DAO overwhelmingly rejected this proposal, with similar decisiveness as the rejection of BCH the first time. The proposal garnered 531,331.83 BSQ of voting weight, but only 0.01% of it was in favor.
This proposal approved the migration of the Bisq markets API from the
bisq.network domain to a new
bisq.markets domain to improve decentralization of the ownership of key Bisq domain names.
This development sparked the start of a new project to revamp the markets website as a dashboard for market activity and DAO reporting.