Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BSQ trading fee update for Cycle 34 #372

Closed
MwithM opened this issue Mar 28, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

BSQ trading fee update for Cycle 34 #372

MwithM opened this issue Mar 28, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@MwithM
Copy link

MwithM commented Mar 28, 2022

This proposal keeps a record of the process to keep the BSQ trading fee at the target discount to BTC trading fee. It will remain open until we need to update BSQ trading fees again.

Last update was #357

I did a mistake and an update was required for Cycle 33, thus the extreme discount and fee raise now.

Cycle 34

Parameters (see issue)

  • USD/BTC price: 46500
  • USD/BSQ price: 1.15
  • Current BSQ discount: 74.7

image
image

It's necessary to update BSQ trading fee on Cycle 34.

New BSQ trading fees

A change parameter request for BSQ trading fees will be submitted to DAO voting:
New BSQ maker fee: 19.41 BSQ per BTC.
New BSQ taker fee: 142.33 BSQ per BTC.

BSQ trading fees are calculated using the new values proposed at #365.
Discount target is 60% and should be adjusted back to exactly 60% every cycle if it's not within the 55-65% range.

@MwithM
Copy link
Author

MwithM commented Mar 29, 2022

Maker: 6598e3d26925951e04184c5e19522b48ce5f7cd6c607b2f3f2ff8eb9227d88af
Taker: 8394570a7e7df1755c6556c9ab3802b44296e61c042a053b3bd8428e97c290c5

@MwithM
Copy link
Author

MwithM commented Apr 7, 2022

Proposal was rejected due to lack of quorum, parameter changes need at least 100.000BSQ to be accepted.

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Member

ripcurlx commented Apr 7, 2022

Damn - I missed the voting this time because of personal issues 🤦

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants